This history item belongs to Formica lutea Smith, 1858
Its current taxon owner(s) is Camponotus luteus
Status as species: Mayr, 1863a: 417; Roger, 1863b: 3; Smith, 1871a: 304; Mayr, 1886c: 354; Dalla Torre, 1893: 240; Emery, 1896j: 378 (in list); Bingham, 1903: 379; Emery, 1925d: 95; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 248; Zhang, 1989: 306; Bolton, 1995b: 109; Bharti et al., 2016: 25.
Status as species: {ref 127213}: 417; {ref 128094}: 3; {ref 128707}: 304; {ref 127239}: 354; {ref 124002}: 240; {ref 124614}: 378 (in list); {ref 122766}: 379; {ref 124775}: 95; {ref 123583}: 248; {ref 130597}: 306; {ref 122860}: 109; {ref 142873}: 25.
- Item type: taxt
- Created at: 2020-09-15
- Updated at: 2020-09-15
Related records
Taxa belonging to this history item's protonym
| Camponotus luteus | Species | Valid |
| Formica lutea | Species |
Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Camponotus luteus (Smith, 1858)
|
Other history items belonging to Formica lutea
| #247684 | Combination in Camponotus: Roger, 1863b: 3. |
| #283464 | Combination in Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex): Emery, 1925d: 95. |
| #290891 (selected) | Status as species: Mayr, 1863a: 417; Roger, 1863b: 3; Smith, 1871a: 304; Mayr, 1886c: 354; Dalla Torre, 1893: 240; Emery, 1896j: 378 (in list); Bingham, 1903: 379; Emery, 1925d: 95; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 248; Zhang, 1989: 306; Bolton, 1995b: 109; Bharti et al., 2016: 25. |