This history item belongs to Formica micans Nylander, 1856

Its current taxon owner(s) is Camponotus micans

[Note: Collingwood, 1978: 72, lists Camponotus micans as senior synonym of Camponotus rufoglaucus. In error because (i) Camponotus rufoglaucus has priority, (ii) the two names have never otherwise been considered synonymous, either before or after 1978.] 

[Note: {ref 123763}: 72, lists {prott 158885} as senior synonym of {prott 159360}. In error because (i) {prott 159360} has priority, (ii) the two names have never otherwise been considered synonymous, either before or after 1978.]
  • Item type: taxt
  • Created at: 2023-03-06
  • Updated at: 2024-06-07
Related records
Taxa belonging to this history item's protonym
Camponotus micans Species Valid
Formica micans Species Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Camponotus micans (Nylander, 1856)
Other history items belonging to Formica micans
#247855 Roger, 1859: 229 (q.); Emery, 1916a: 236 (q.)
#247856 Combination in Camponotus: Mayr, 1861: 36 (in key).
#283471 Combination in Camponotus (Myrmosericus): Menozzi, 1921: 32.
#247857 Subspecies of Camponotus rufoglaucus: Forel, 1892k: 237; Emery, 1893m: 243, 250 (footnote); Emery, 1893e: 87 (footnote); Forel, 1894d: 3; Emery, 1895i: 49 (in key); Forel, 1895e: 227; Emery, 1896j: 372 (in list); Forel, 1902a: 158; Forel, 1904d: 12; Karavaiev, 1912a: 21; Emery, 1914c: 159; Emery, 1916a: 225; Stitz, 1917: 350; Santschi, 1919e: 247; Menozzi, 1921: 32; Menozzi, 1922c: 331; Emery, 1924a: 9; Emery, 1925d: 106; Donisthorpe, 1927a: 9; Kutter, 1928: 66; Menozzi, 1934: 165; Finzi, 1940: 164; Ceballos, 1956: 313; Cagniant, 1964: 91; Cagniant, 1966b: 281.
#247858 Status as species: Smith, 1858a: 30; Roger, 1859: 228; Mayr, 1861: 36 (in key); Roger, 1861b: 163; Mayr, 1862: 663; Mayr, 1863a: 400; Roger, 1863b: 1; Emery, 1870: 193; Dours, 1873: 164; André, 1874b: 177 (in key); Emery, 1878a: viii (in list); Emery, 1878: 44; Mayr, 1879: 647; Emery & Forel, 1879: 447; Forel, 1879a: 77; Saunders, 1890: 202; André, 1882b: 147 (in key); Emery, 1884: 376; Forel, 1885b: 176; Forel, 1886d: 239; Emery, 1889: 513; Forel, 1890b: lxvii; Emery, 1891c: 21; Emery, 1892: 120; Dalla Torre, 1893: 242; Medina, 1893: 104; Forel, 1909c: 106; Santschi, 1925g: 359; Santschi, 1931a: 11; Santschi, 1932e: 71; Santschi, 1932h: 4; Santschi, 1936c: 208; Santschi, 1938a: 43; Santschi, 1939c: 5; Menozzi, 1940a: 271; Baroni Urbani, 1964b: 62; Baroni Urbani, 1964c: 161; Arnol'di, 1967: 1828; Cagniant, 1968a: 146; Collingwood & Yarrow, 1969: 82; Cagniant, 1970c: 34; Baroni Urbani, 1971c: 189; Collingwood, 1978: 91 (in key); Bolton, 1995b: 111; Mei, 1995: 767; Poldi et al., 1995: 7; Cagniant, 1996b: 94; Espadaler, 1997g: 27; Collingwood & Prince, 1998: 25 (in key); Cagniant, 2006: 194; Borowiec, 2014: 37 (see note in bibliography); Lebas et al., 2016: 144; Arcos et al., 2022: 10.
#308077 (selected) [Note: Collingwood, 1978: 72, lists Camponotus micans as senior synonym of Camponotus rufoglaucus. In error because (i) Camponotus rufoglaucus has priority, (ii) the two names have never otherwise been considered synonymous, either before or after 1978.]