This history item belongs to Crematogaster auberti var. mosis Forel, 1909

Its current taxon owner(s) is Crematogaster mosis

[Note: Collingwood & Agosti, 1996: 331, ascribe Crematogaster mosis to Emery, 1869a: 35, and raise it to species rank. There is no Emery entry at this reference, but Emery, 1869a: 135, describes Crematogaster laestrygon (again without mention of Crematogaster mosis); therefore the apparent attribution of Crematogaster mosis to Emery, and its elevation to species-rank, is incorrect and is ignored.] 

[Note: {ref 130931}: 331, ascribe {tax 435762} to {ref 124511}: 35, and raise it to species rank. There is no Emery entry at this reference, but {ref 124511}: 135, describes {tax 435638} (again without mention of {tax 435762}); therefore the apparent attribution of {tax 435762} to Emery, and its elevation to species-rank, is incorrect and is ignored.]
  • Item type: taxt
  • Created at: 2012-09-12
  • Updated at: 2020-10-12
Related records
Taxa belonging to this history item's protonym
Crematogaster auberti mosis Subspecies Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Crematogaster mosis Forel, 1909
Crematogaster mosis Species Valid
Other history items belonging to Crematogaster auberti var. mosis
#252187 [First available use of Crematogaster auberti jehovae mosis Forel, 1907e; unavailable (infrasubspecific) name.]
#291265 As unavailable (infrasubspecific) name: Emery, 1912e: 661; Emery, 1922c: 142; Emery, 1926: 3.
#252188 Subspecies of Crematogaster jehovae: Menozzi, 1933b: 61 (in key); Santschi, 1937e: 313 (in key); Bolton, 1995b: 158; Vonshak & Ionescu-Hirsch, 2010: 42.
#252189 (selected) [Note: Collingwood & Agosti, 1996: 331, ascribe Crematogaster mosis to Emery, 1869a: 35, and raise it to species rank. There is no Emery entry at this reference, but Emery, 1869a: 135, describes Crematogaster laestrygon (again without mention of Crematogaster mosis); therefore the apparent attribution of Crematogaster mosis to Emery, and its elevation to species-rank, is incorrect and is ignored.]
#277505 Status as species: Collingwood et al., 2011: 426; Tohmé & Tohmé, 2014: 135.