This history item belongs to Formica rufoglauca Jerdon, 1851

Its current taxon owner(s) is Camponotus rufoglaucus

Status as species: Smith, 1858a: 16; Mayr, 1863a: 420; Roger, 1863b: 3; Smith, 1871a: 303; Forel, 1892k: 237; Dalla Torre, 1893: 250; Mayr, 1893b: 195; Emery, 1893h: 252; Forel, 1895e: 227; Emery, 1895i: 48 (in key); Emery, 1896j: 372 (in list); Mayr, 1897: 432; Bingham, 1903: 363; Mayr, 1907b: 20; Forel, 1908b: 6; Forel, 1911c: 227; Karavaiev, 1911b: 12; Forel, 1913l: 129; Wheeler, 1921c: 545; Wheeler, 1922: 246, 966; Wheeler, 1923c: 6; Arnold, 1924: 689; Emery, 1925d: 105; Wheeler, 1927g: 115; Menozzi, 1930h: 328; Mukerjee, 1930: 159; Finzi, 1936: 190; Finzi, 1939a: 160; Finzi, 1940: 164; Donisthorpe, 1942d: 458; Weber, 1943d: 336; Donisthorpe, 1943b: 204; Arnold, 1947: 136; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 238; Cagniant, 1964: 91; Collingwood, 1970b: 381; Barquín, 1981: 411; Bolton, 1995b: 121; Tiwari, 1999: 70; Mathew & Tiwari, 2000: 354; Jaitrong & Nabhitabhata, 2005: 15; Karmaly & Narendran, 2006: 109; Pfeiffer et al., 2011: 38; Ran & Zhou, 2011: 69; Guénard & Dunn, 2012: 29; Hita Garcia et al., 2013: 205; Borowiec, 2014: 40 (see note in bibliography); Bharti et al., 2016: 25; Jaitrong et al., 2016: 28; Dias et al., 2020: 36; Khachonpisitsak et al., 2020: 45. 

Status as species: {ref 128685}: 16; {ref 127213}: 420; {ref 128094}: 3; {ref 128707}: 303; {ref 125041}: 237; {ref 124002}: 250; {ref 127245}: 195; {ref 124568}: 252; {ref 125068}: 227; {ref 124596}: 48 (in key); {ref 124614}: 372 (in list); {ref 127204}: 432; {ref 122766}: 363; {ref 127253}: 20; {ref 125180}: 6; {ref 125212}: 227; {ref 126238}: 12; {ref 125249}: 129; {ref 130144}: 545; {ref 133015}: 246, 966; {ref 130165}: 6; {ref 122313}: 689; {ref 124775}: 105; {ref 130191}: 115; {ref 127359}: 328; {ref 127486}: 159; {ref 124917}: 190; {ref 124936}: 160; {ref 124939}: 164; {ref 124317}: 458; {ref 129729}: 336; {ref 124324}: 204; {ref 122317}: 136; {ref 123583}: 238; {ref 123447}: 91; {ref 123800}: 381; {ref 122525}: 411; {ref 122860}: 121; {ref 132464}: 70; {ref 131843}: 354; {ref 131538}: 15; {ref 132952}: 109; {ref 132946}: 38; {ref 143596}: 69; {ref 142253}: 29; {ref 142371}: 205; {ref 142632}: 40 (see note in bibliography); {ref 142873}: 25; {ref 143594}: 28; {ref 143815}: 36; {ref 143923}: 45.
  • Item type: taxt
  • Created at: 2019-06-01
  • Updated at: 2023-03-27
Related records
Taxa belonging to this history item's protonym
Camponotus rufoglaucus Species Valid
Formica rufoglauca Species Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Camponotus rufoglaucus (Jerdon, 1851)
Other history items belonging to Formica rufoglauca
#278323 [Duplicated in Jerdon, 1854b: 107.]
#248722 Combination in Camponotus: Roger, 1863b: 3.
#282634 Combination in Camponotus (Myrmosericus): Forel, 1912j: 91.
#278324 (selected) Status as species: Smith, 1858a: 16; Mayr, 1863a: 420; Roger, 1863b: 3; Smith, 1871a: 303; Forel, 1892k: 237; Dalla Torre, 1893: 250; Mayr, 1893b: 195; Emery, 1893h: 252; Forel, 1895e: 227; Emery, 1895i: 48 (in key); Emery, 1896j: 372 (in list); Mayr, 1897: 432; Bingham, 1903: 363; Mayr, 1907b: 20; Forel, 1908b: 6; Forel, 1911c: 227; Karavaiev, 1911b: 12; Forel, 1913l: 129; Wheeler, 1921c: 545; Wheeler, 1922: 246, 966; Wheeler, 1923c: 6; Arnold, 1924: 689; Emery, 1925d: 105; Wheeler, 1927g: 115; Menozzi, 1930h: 328; Mukerjee, 1930: 159; Finzi, 1936: 190; Finzi, 1939a: 160; Finzi, 1940: 164; Donisthorpe, 1942d: 458; Weber, 1943d: 336; Donisthorpe, 1943b: 204; Arnold, 1947: 136; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 238; Cagniant, 1964: 91; Collingwood, 1970b: 381; Barquín, 1981: 411; Bolton, 1995b: 121; Tiwari, 1999: 70; Mathew & Tiwari, 2000: 354; Jaitrong & Nabhitabhata, 2005: 15; Karmaly & Narendran, 2006: 109; Pfeiffer et al., 2011: 38; Ran & Zhou, 2011: 69; Guénard & Dunn, 2012: 29; Hita Garcia et al., 2013: 205; Borowiec, 2014: 40 (see note in bibliography); Bharti et al., 2016: 25; Jaitrong et al., 2016: 28; Dias et al., 2020: 36; Khachonpisitsak et al., 2020: 45.
#248723 Senior synonym of Camponotus redtenbacheri: Forel, 1892k: 237; Emery, 1896j: 372; Bingham, 1903: 363; Emery, 1925d: 105; Bolton, 1995b: 121; Tiwari, 1999: 70; Karmaly & Narendran, 2006: 109.
#278325 [Note: Collingwood, 1978: 72, lists Camponotus micans as senior synonym of Camponotus rufoglaucus. In error because, (i) Camponotus rufoglaucus has priority, (ii) the two have never otherwise been considered synonymous, either before or after 1978.]