This history item belongs to Formica cinctella Gerstäcker, 1859

Its current taxon owner(s) is Camponotus cinctellus

As unavailable (infrasubspecific) name: Emery, 1896j: 372 (in list). 

As unavailable (infrasubspecific) name: {ref 124614}: 372 (in list).
  • Item type: taxt
  • Created at: 2020-07-07
  • Updated at: 2020-07-07
Related records
Taxa belonging to this history item's protonym
Camponotus cinctellus Species Valid
Camponotus rufoglaucus cinctellus Subspecies Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Camponotus cinctellus (Gerstäcker, 1859)
Formica cinctella Species Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Camponotus cinctellus (Gerstäcker, 1859)
Other history items belonging to Formica cinctella
#246255 [Also described as new by Gerstäcker, 1862: 510; type locality from this reference.]
#246256 Arnold, 1924: 689 (s.)
#246257 Combination in Camponotus: Roger, 1863b: 2.
#282632 Combination in Camponotus (Myrmosericus): Forel, 1913b: 340.
#282633 (selected) As unavailable (infrasubspecific) name: Emery, 1896j: 372 (in list).
#246258 Subspecies of Camponotus rufoglaucus: Mayr, 1893b: 195; Emery, 1895b: 180; Emery, 1895i: 48 (in key); Emery, 1896i: 158; Forel, 1903h: 564; Forel, 1907i: 89; Forel, 1909b: 67; Forel, 1910c: 271; Forel, 1910f: 457; Forel, 1910e: 25; Forel, 1911f: 371; Stitz, 1911b: 392; Karavaiev, 1911b: 12; Forel, 1913b: 340; Forel, 1913i: 355; Forel, 1913k: 224; Forel, 1914d: 254; Santschi, 1914b: 133; Santschi, 1914d: 381; Santschi, 1914e: 41; Forel, 1915c: 350; Stitz, 1916: 401; Wheeler, 1922: 246, 966; Viehmeyer, 1923: 93; Arnold, 1924: 689; Emery, 1925d: 105; Menozzi, 1933a: 112; Santschi, 1935a: 280; Finzi, 1939a: 160; Menozzi, 1939c: 107; Weber, 1943d: 336; Menozzi & Consani, 1952: 69.
#246259 Status as species: Mayr, 1863a: 413; Roger, 1863b: 2; Dalla Torre, 1893: 224; Santschi, 1939c: 10; Bolton, 1995b: 92; Hita Garcia et al., 2013: 204; Madl, 2019: 14.
#246260 Senior synonym of Camponotus venustus: Emery, 1895i: 48 (in key); Emery, 1925d: 105; Bolton, 1995b: 92.