This history item belongs to Formica nodus Brullé, 1833

Its current taxon owner(s) is Cataglyphis nodus

Status as species: Arnol'di, 1964: 1802; Pisarski, 1965: 421; Aktaç, 1977: 128; Collingwood, 1985: 290; Agosti & Collingwood, 1987a: 59; Agosti & Collingwood, 1987b: 284 (in key); Agosti, 1990b: 1489; Dlussky et al., 1990: 153; Atanassov & Dlussky, 1992: 291; Collingwood, 1993b: 195; Arakelian, 1994: 108; Bolton, 1995b: 136; Radchenko, 1997e: 433; Gallé et al., 1998: 217; Radchenko, 1998a: 505 (in key); Csősz & Markó, 2005: 234; Bračko, 2006: 146; Markó et al., 2006: 67; Petrov, 2006: 110 (in key); Werner & Wiezik, 2007: 143; Gratiashvili & Barjadze, 2008: 132; Paknia et al., 2008: 154; Lush, 2009: 116; Lapeva-Gjonova et al., 2010: 58; Collingwood et al., 2011: 462; Csősz et al., 2011: 59; Legakis, 2011: 34; Karaman, 2011b: 75; Borowiec & Salata, 2012: 486; Kiran & Karaman, 2012: 9; Borowiec & Salata, 2013: 383; Borowiec, 2014: 58; Bračko et al., 2014: 19; Lebas et al., 2016: 164; Borowiec & Salata, 2018a: 5; Salata & Borowiec, 2018c: 44; Seifert, 2018: 298; Bračko, 2019: 170; Khalili-Moghadam et al., 2019: 169; Borowiec & Salata, 2020: 6; Borowiec & Salata, 2022: 144 (redescription); Sert & Karaman, 2024: 397.


Status as species: {ref 122339}: 1802; {ref 127818}: 421; {ref 122158}: 128; {ref 123767}: 290; {ref 122148}: 59; {ref 122149}: 284 (in key); {ref 122142}: 1489; {ref 124151}: 153; {ref 122405}: 291; {ref 123807}: 195; {ref 122300}: 108; {ref 122860}: 136; {ref 132074}: 433; {ref 131353}: 217; {ref 132078}: 505 (in key); {ref 130956}: 234; {ref 132800}: 146; {ref 131816}: 67; {ref 132014}: 110 (in key); {ref 132940}: 143; {ref 131396}: 132; {ref 143565}: 154; {ref 131754}: 116; {ref 132768}: 58; {ref 132856}: 462; {ref 132876}: 59; {ref 132927}: 34; {ref 142634}: 75; {ref 142313}: 486; {ref 142245}: 9; {ref 142546}: 383; {ref 142632}: 58; {ref 142696}: 19; {ref 143395}: 164; {ref 143244}: 5; {ref 143275}: 44; {ref 143563}: 298; {ref 143818}: 170; {ref 143350}: 169; {ref 143620}: 6; {ref 144091}: 144 (redescription); {ref 144400}: 397.
  • Item type: taxt
  • Created at: 2020-07-07
  • Updated at: 2024-09-10
Related records
Taxa belonging to this history item's protonym
Cataglyphis bicolor nodus Subspecies Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Cataglyphis nodus (Brullé, 1833)
Cataglyphis nodus Species Valid
Formica nodus Species Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Cataglyphis nodus (Brullé, 1833)
Other history items belonging to Formica nodus
#250131 [Misspelled as nuda by Santschi, 1929b: 50 (in text); Santschi, 1933b: 108.]
#292917 [Misspelled as nobus by Arnol'di, 1948a: 212 (in list).]
#306848 Borowiec & Salata, 2022: 147 (s.q.m.)
#250123 Combination in Cataglyphis: Mayr, 1861: 44.
#282645 Combination in Myrmecocystus: Emery & Forel, 1879: 449.
#250124 Junior synonym of Cataglyphis viatica: Roger, 1861b: 163; Mayr, 1861: 44 (in key); Mayr, 1863a: 402; Roger, 1863b: 12; André, 1874c: 202 (in list); Emery & Forel, 1879: 449; Dalla Torre, 1893: 218.
#250126 Subspecies of Cataglyphis bicolor: Emery, 1925d: 265; Soudek, 1925b: 15; Santschi, 1926f: 290; Menozzi, 1927e: 119; Finzi, 1928c: 791; Menozzi, 1929f: 128; Santschi, 1929b: 43; Santschi, 1929c: 106; Finzi, 1930d: 317; Santschi, 1931a: 13; Santschi, 1932c: 520; Menozzi, 1932e: 454; Santschi, 1933b: 108; Menozzi, 1933b: 86; Santschi, 1934d: 281; Zimmermann, 1934: 69; Grandi, 1935: 104; Zimmermann, 1935: 54; Finzi, 1936: 192; Santschi, 1936c: 210; Menozzi, 1936b: 305; Finzi, 1939c: 160; Santschi, 1939c: 7; Menozzi, 1940a: 271; Finzi, 1940: 165; Arnol'di, 1948a: 212 (in list); Bernard, 1948: 162; Bernard, 1950c: 292; Donisthorpe, 1950e: 1065; Bernard, 1953a: 199; Délye, 1960: 261; Hamann & Klemm, 1967: 419; Cagniant, 1970c: 30.
#250128 Junior synonym of Cataglyphis bicolor: Wehner et al., 1983: 7.
#282646 (selected) Status as species: Arnol'di, 1964: 1802; Pisarski, 1965: 421; Aktaç, 1977: 128; Collingwood, 1985: 290; Agosti & Collingwood, 1987a: 59; Agosti & Collingwood, 1987b: 284 (in key); Agosti, 1990b: 1489; Dlussky et al., 1990: 153; Atanassov & Dlussky, 1992: 291; Collingwood, 1993b: 195; Arakelian, 1994: 108; Bolton, 1995b: 136; Radchenko, 1997e: 433; Gallé et al., 1998: 217; Radchenko, 1998a: 505 (in key); Csősz & Markó, 2005: 234; Bračko, 2006: 146; Markó et al., 2006: 67; Petrov, 2006: 110 (in key); Werner & Wiezik, 2007: 143; Gratiashvili & Barjadze, 2008: 132; Paknia et al., 2008: 154; Lush, 2009: 116; Lapeva-Gjonova et al., 2010: 58; Collingwood et al., 2011: 462; Csősz et al., 2011: 59; Legakis, 2011: 34; Karaman, 2011b: 75; Borowiec & Salata, 2012: 486; Kiran & Karaman, 2012: 9; Borowiec & Salata, 2013: 383; Borowiec, 2014: 58; Bračko et al., 2014: 19; Lebas et al., 2016: 164; Borowiec & Salata, 2018a: 5; Salata & Borowiec, 2018c: 44; Seifert, 2018: 298; Bračko, 2019: 170; Khalili-Moghadam et al., 2019: 169; Borowiec & Salata, 2020: 6; Borowiec & Salata, 2022: 144 (redescription); Sert & Karaman, 2024: 397.
#250130 Senior synonym of Cataglyphis nodus caucasicola: Dlussky et al., 1990: 153; Arakelian, 1994: 108; Bolton, 1995b: 136; Radchenko, 1997e: 433; Gratiashvili & Barjadze, 2008: 132.
#282647 Senior synonym of Cataglyphis nodus mesasiatica: Dlussky et al., 1990: 153; Bolton, 1995b: 136; Radchenko, 1997e: 433.
#282648 Senior synonym of Cataglyphis viatica orientalis: Emery, 1925d: 265; Finzi, 1928c: 791; Santschi, 1929b: 43; Finzi, 1930d: 317; Donisthorpe, 1950e: 1065; Pisarski, 1965: 421; Agosti, 1990b: 1489; Bolton, 1995b: 136; Radchenko, 1997e: 433; Gallé et al., 1998: 217; Csősz et al., 2011: 59; Kiran & Karaman, 2012: 9.
#282649 Senior synonym of Cataglyphis bicolor rufiventris: Borowiec & Salata, 2013: 383 (in text).