This history item belongs to Formica testaceipes Smith, 1858

Its current taxon owner(s) is Camponotus testaceipes

Status as species: Mayr, 1862: 662 (redescription); Mayr, 1863a: 401; Roger, 1863b: 4; Mayr, 1876: 60 (in key); Emery, 1887a: 211; Dalla Torre, 1893: 254; Emery, 1896j: 372; Forel, 1902j: 494; Forel, 1907j: 301; Wheeler, 1909a: 29; Forel, 1915b: 100; Emery, 1925d: 102; Wheeler, 1934d: 159; Brown, 1956c: 39; Taylor & Brown, 1985: 120. 

Status as species: {ref 127190}: 662 (redescription); {ref 127213}: 401; {ref 128094}: 4; {ref 127196}: 60 (in key); {ref 124535}: 211; {ref 124002}: 254; {ref 124614}: 372; {ref 125129}: 494; {ref 125178}: 301; {ref 130035}: 29; {ref 125258}: 100; {ref 124775}: 102; {ref 130253}: 159; {ref 123128}: 39; {ref 129218}: 120.
  • Item type: taxt
  • Created at: 2020-09-16
  • Updated at: 2020-09-16
Related records
Taxa belonging to this history item's protonym
Camponotus testaceipes Species Homonym
homonym replaced by Camponotus terebrans (Lowne, 1865)
Formica testaceipes Species Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Camponotus testaceipes (Smith, 1858)
Other history items belonging to Formica testaceipes
#249154 [Junior primary homonym of Formica testaceipes Leach, 1825 (Emery, 1921a: 24).]
#249155 Mayr, 1862: 662 (q.); Forel, 1902j: 494 (s.m.)
#249156 Combination in Camponotus: Mayr, 1862: 662.
#285020 Combination in Camponotus (Myrmophyma): Forel, 1914a: 269.
#285019 Combination in Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex): Emery, 1925d: 102.
#290961 (selected) Status as species: Mayr, 1862: 662 (redescription); Mayr, 1863a: 401; Roger, 1863b: 4; Mayr, 1876: 60 (in key); Emery, 1887a: 211; Dalla Torre, 1893: 254; Emery, 1896j: 372; Forel, 1902j: 494; Forel, 1907j: 301; Wheeler, 1909a: 29; Forel, 1915b: 100; Emery, 1925d: 102; Wheeler, 1934d: 159; Brown, 1956c: 39; Taylor & Brown, 1985: 120.
#290962 Replacement name: Camponotus terebrans Lowne, 1865a.
#290963 [Note: Camponotus terebrans Lowne, 1865a oldest junior synonym of Camponotus testaceipes Smith, 1858a (synonymy by Mayr, 1876: 65); hence Camponotus terebrans Lowne, 1865a first available replacement name (Bolton, 1995b: 126).]