Again, no big deal visually, but slightly malformatted items are harder to parse by script.
Missing colons
Redundant colon
Something weird ("Status as species")
"see also"
Malformatted but simple "see also"s like this one:
See also Ward et al., 2016: 346
are easy for a script to pick up, so we don't have to spend time cleaning them up manually, but more advanced items like this one are not easy to parse:
Combination in †Nothomyrmica: Wheeler, 1915i: 61; in †Eocenomyrma: Dlussky & Radchenko, 2006b: 565. See also Radchenko & Dlussky, 2016: 405; Radchenko & Perkovsky, 2018: 287, figs. 1-2.
Fredrik Palmkron commented almost 5 years ago: show rawNice! It will make identifying and fixing homonym cases easier. Noted on the 'see also's; I will put %github842 on hold. Aaaand you should receive and email notification for this.
Nice! It will make identifying and fixing homonym cases easier.
Noted on the 'see also's; I will put GitHub #842 on hold.
Aaaand you should receive and email notification for this.
Brian Fisher commented almost 5 years ago: show raw@user60 I took all of these but the "see also" which I think don't need corrected at this time because all "see also {" and "see also: {" need to be replaced with "Status as species;" content from Bolton NGC.
@Fredrik Palmkron
I took all of these but the "see also" which I think don't need corrected at this time because all "see also {" and "see also: {" need to be replaced with "Status as species;" content from Bolton NGC.