This history item belongs to Formica laevigata Smith, 1858

Its current taxon owner(s) is Camponotus laevigatus

Status as species: Mayr, 1863a: 416; Roger, 1863b: 5; Mayr, 1886c: 356; Mayr, 1886d: 420; Cresson, 1887: 255; Dalla Torre, 1893: 238; Emery, 1893k: 671; Emery, 1896j: 372 (in list); Wheeler, 1910g: 327 (redescription); Wheeler, 1910a: 571; Forel, 1914a: 266; Wheeler, 1917a: 556; Emery, 1925d: 75; Essig, 1926: 868; Cole, 1936a: 39; Cole, 1942: 388; Creighton, 1950a: 369; Smith, 1951c: 840; Cole, 1954f: 272; Smith, 1967a: 366; Hunt & Snelling, 1975: 22; Yensen et al., 1977: 184; Wheeler & Wheeler, 1978b: 392; Smith, 1979: 1426; Allred, 1982: 455; Wheeler & Wheeler, 1986g: 60; MacKay et al., 1988: 106; Blacker, 1992: 9; Bolton, 1995b: 107; Mackay & Mackay, 2002: 293; Hansen & Klotz, 2005: 83; Ward, 2005: 63; Mackay, 2019: 241 (redescription); Ward & Boudinot, 2021: 46.


Status as species: {ref 127213}: 416; {ref 128094}: 5; {ref 127239}: 356; {ref 127240}: 420; {ref 123936}: 255; {ref 124002}: 238; {ref 124571}: 671; {ref 124614}: 372 (in list); {ref 130050}: 327 (redescription); {ref 130044}: 571; {ref 125251}: 266; {ref 130116}: 556; {ref 124775}: 75; {ref 124843}: 868; {ref 123685}: 39; {ref 123672}: 388; {ref 123910}: 369; {ref 128824}: 840; {ref 123721}: 272; {ref 128863}: 366; {ref 126032}: 22; {ref 130568}: 184; {ref 129910}: 392; {ref 128659}: 1426; {ref 122181}: 455; {ref 129925}: 60; {ref 127023}: 106; {ref 122776}: 9; {ref 122860}: 107; {ref 131795}: 293; {ref 131435}: 83; {ref 132562}: 63; {ref 143434}: 241 (redescription); {ref 143856}: 46.
  • Item type: taxt
  • Created at: 2013-01-29
  • Updated at: 2021-04-21
Related records
Taxa belonging to this history item's protonym
Camponotus laevigatus Species Valid
Formica laevigata Species Obsolete combination
an obsolete combination of Camponotus laevigatus (Smith, 1858)
Other history items belonging to Formica laevigata
#295199 Lectotype designation: Mackay, 2019: 246.
#295200 [Misspelled as levigatus by Roger, 1863b: 5; Dalla Torre, 1893: 238, and others.]
#295201 [Misspelled as laevitatus by Borgmeier, 1927c: 149.]
#247517 Wheeler, 1910g: 327 (s.m.); Wheeler & Wheeler, 1968a: 216 (l.)
#247518 Combination in Camponotus: Roger, 1863b: 5.
#283450 Combination in Camponotus (Camponotus): Forel, 1914a: 266.
#274585 (selected) Status as species: Mayr, 1863a: 416; Roger, 1863b: 5; Mayr, 1886c: 356; Mayr, 1886d: 420; Cresson, 1887: 255; Dalla Torre, 1893: 238; Emery, 1893k: 671; Emery, 1896j: 372 (in list); Wheeler, 1910g: 327 (redescription); Wheeler, 1910a: 571; Forel, 1914a: 266; Wheeler, 1917a: 556; Emery, 1925d: 75; Essig, 1926: 868; Cole, 1936a: 39; Cole, 1942: 388; Creighton, 1950a: 369; Smith, 1951c: 840; Cole, 1954f: 272; Smith, 1967a: 366; Hunt & Snelling, 1975: 22; Yensen et al., 1977: 184; Wheeler & Wheeler, 1978b: 392; Smith, 1979: 1426; Allred, 1982: 455; Wheeler & Wheeler, 1986g: 60; MacKay et al., 1988: 106; Blacker, 1992: 9; Bolton, 1995b: 107; Mackay & Mackay, 2002: 293; Hansen & Klotz, 2005: 83; Ward, 2005: 63; Mackay, 2019: 241 (redescription); Ward & Boudinot, 2021: 46.
#295226 [Note: Mackay, 2019: 241, records that “most of these (earlier) references are probably misidentifications of Camponotus laevissimus”.]
#295204 Senior synonym of Camponotus quercicola: Ward & Boudinot, 2021: 46.